All entries

Jesus: Man, Messenger, Messiah · 5. The Crucifixion

Were the stories about Jesus passed on reliably?

In short

The claim being examined

Even if written late, the Gospel traditions are said to have been preserved faithfully by a careful oral culture.

The Islamic position

Islam contrasts an uncontrolled oral tradition with the Muslim system of — named, verified chains of transmission with a science of criticism attached.

Analysis

This is a point about method, not a jab. Passing things on by word of mouth is not unreliable in itself — but reliability needs controls, and the Christian tradition never built machinery for tracking who passed on a saying, when, and with what reputation. The system (the recorded chain of narrators behind every ), with its rejected narrators and graded reports, exists precisely so that transmission can be audited. That two well-known Gospel passages entered the text late and now sit in brackets in modern Bibles shows what happens without such controls.

From the Qur'an

إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا ٱلذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُۥ لَحَـٰفِظُونَ

innā naḥnu nazzalnā l-dhik'ra wa-innā lahu laḥāfiẓūna

Indeed it is We who sent down the Reminder, and indeed We will be its guardian.

From the Bible

—

The pericope of the woman caught in adultery: absent from the earliest and best Greek manuscripts.

Read it in their Bible

—

The longer ending of Mark: absent from Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.

Read it in their Bible

From the Sunnah

Introduction to Sahih Muslim · Sahih

Abdullah ibn al-Mubarak said: The isnad is part of the religion; were it not for the isnad, whoever wished could say whatever he wished.

Sources

The spoken script for this entry is inside the app.

Members get the word-for-word delivery guide — how to open, what to say, the likely replies and how to close warmly — plus notes, a dawah journal and the study assistant.

Open the app

More in 5. The Crucifixion