All entries

Jesus: Man, Messenger, Messiah · 6. Theological Alterations

Adoptionism and the Ebionites: an early Christology the Church erased

Handle with care. Do not say the Ebionites were Muslims or that Islam descends from them. They are a parallel worth noting, reconstructed largely from their opponents' writings.

In short

The claim being examined

Christians usually assume that belief in Jesus's divinity was universal from the beginning and that alternatives were late heresies.

The Islamic position

The Ebionites — Law-observant Jewish followers of Jesus who held him to be a human prophet and messiah — stand remarkably close to the Qur'anic portrait.

Analysis

Ehrman devotes chapter 6 to showing that proto-orthodox scribes altered texts to close off adoptionist readings, which presupposes that adoptionist Christians were reading those texts and finding support in them. The loss of the Ebionite literature is itself part of the argument: the surviving record is the record kept by the victors. For dawah this is a substantive parallel, but it must be stated carefully — the Ebionites were not Muslims and their beliefs are reconstructed from hostile sources.

From the Qur'an

Q 43:59

إِنْ هُوَ إِلَّا عَبْدٌ أَنْعَمْنَا عَلَيْهِ

He was not but a servant upon whom We bestowed favour.

From the Bible

Acts 2:22

Greek: andra apodedeigmenon apo tou theou

Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with deeds of power…

Read it in their Bible

Sources

Bart D. Ehrman · Bart D. Ehrman, *Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why* (HarperSanFrancisco, 2005), ch. 6 'Theologically Motivated Alterations of the Text', pp. 153-161

The spoken script for this entry is inside the app.

Members get the word-for-word delivery guide — how to open, what to say, the likely replies and how to close warmly — plus notes, a dawah journal and the study assistant.

Open the app

More in 6. Theological Alterations