All entries

Jesus: Man, Messenger, Messiah · 4. The Quest for Origins

Tischendorf and Codex Sinaiticus

In short

The claim being examined

The oldest Bibles are pictured as continuously preserved treasures of the Church.

The Islamic position

The recovery of the earliest text depended on nineteenth-century discovery, meaning the intervening centuries read a demonstrably later text.

Analysis

Ehrman quotes Tischendorf's own narrative at length. The scholarly significance is that Sinaiticus and Vaticanus omit the longer ending of Mark and the story of the woman taken in adultery, among much else; the reconstructed text of the last 150 years is substantially the text of these manuscripts rather than the Received Text. The devotional significance, which Ehrman notes wryly, is that the manuscript's own discoverer regarded the work as a divinely ordained task.

Sources

Bart D. Ehrman · Constantin von Tischendorf · Bart D. Ehrman, *Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why* (HarperSanFrancisco, 2005), ch. 4, pp. 117-125

The spoken script for this entry is inside the app.

Members get the word-for-word delivery guide — how to open, what to say, the likely replies and how to close warmly — plus notes, a dawah journal and the study assistant.

Open the app

More in 4. The Quest for Origins