All entries

Jesus: Man, Messenger, Messiah · Introduction

Mark 2:26 and Abiathar: the verse that broke inerrancy for Ehrman

In short

The claim being examined

For inerrantists, the original text of the Bible contains no historical mistakes; any apparent error must be a misunderstanding on the reader's part.

The Islamic position

Islam's claim about scripture is not that a text is faultless because tradition says so, but that revelation is preserved and verifiable. A doctrine that has to be rescued by strained readings invites exactly the scrutiny Q 2:79 raises.

Analysis

Ehrman recounts writing a long paper reconciling Mark 2:26 with 1 Samuel 21 by arguing that the Greek phrase means only that the episode occurs in the section of scripture where Abiathar is a major character. The simpler reading is that the Gospel writer misremembered. The point Ehrman draws is not that Mark is worthless but that the text is a human product with human characteristics, which is precisely what textual criticism assumes and inerrancy denies. Matthew and Luke, notably, both drop the priest's name when they reproduce the episode.

From the Qur'an

Q 2:79

فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ

So woe to those who write the Scripture with their own hands, then say, 'This is from Allah.'

From the Bible

Mark 2:26

Greek: epi Abiathar archiereos

…in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence.

Read it in their Bible

1 Samuel 21:1-6

Hebrew: Achimelech

David came to Nob, to Ahimelech the priest… so the priest gave him the holy bread.

Read it in their Bible

Sources

Bart D. Ehrman · Bart D. Ehrman, *Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why* (HarperSanFrancisco, 2005), Introduction, pp. 8-9

The spoken script for this entry is inside the app.

Members get the word-for-word delivery guide — how to open, what to say, the likely replies and how to close warmly — plus notes, a dawah journal and the study assistant.

Open the app

More in Introduction