All entries

Jesus: Man, Messenger, Messiah · Introduction

Mark 2:26 and Abiathar: the verse that broke inerrancy for Ehrman

In short

The claim being examined

For inerrantists, the original text of the Bible contains no historical mistakes; any apparent error must be a misunderstanding on the reader's part.

The Islamic position

Islam's claim about scripture is not that a text is faultless because tradition says so, but that revelation is preserved and verifiable. A doctrine that has to be rescued by strained readings invites exactly the scrutiny Q 2:79 raises.

Analysis

Ehrman describes writing a long paper reconciling Mark 2:26 with 1 Samuel 21, arguing that the Greek only means the episode sits in the part of scripture where Abiathar looms large. The simpler reading is that the writer of Mark misremembered. His point is not that Mark is worthless, but that this is a human book with human features — which is what (comparing old copies to recover the earliest wording) assumes, and what inerrancy (the belief that scripture contains no error at all) denies. Notably, Matthew and Luke both drop the priest's name when they retell the episode.

From the Qur'an

فَوَيْلٌۭ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ ٱلْكِتَـٰبَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ

fawaylun lilladhīna yaktubūna l-kitāba bi-aydīhim

So woe to those who write the Scripture with their own hands, then say, 'This is from Allah.'

From the Bible

Greek: epi Abiathar archiereos

…in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence.

Read it in their Bible

Hebrew: Achimelech

David came to Nob, to Ahimelech the priest… so the priest gave him the holy bread.

Read it in their Bible

Sources

The spoken script for this entry is inside the app.

Members get the word-for-word delivery guide — how to open, what to say, the likely replies and how to close warmly — plus notes, a dawah journal and the study assistant.

Open the app

More in Introduction